|
Genealogical bewilderment is a term referring to potential identity problems that could be experienced by a child who was either fostered, adopted, or conceived via an assisted reproductive technology procedure such as surrogacy or gamete donation (egg or sperm donation). The concept was first introduced in a 1952 letter to the Journal of Mental Health by psychiatrist E. Wellisch. The term “genealogical bewilderment” was coined in 1964 by psychologist H. J. Sants, a colleague of Wellisch, referring to the plight of children who have uncertain, little, or no knowledge of one or both of their natural parents. Sants argued that genealogical bewilderment constituted a large part of the additional stress that adoptees experienced that is not experienced by children being raised by their natural parents.〔O'Shaughnessy, T. (1994). ''Adoption, social work and social theory: Making the connections.'' Brookfield, VT: Ashgate Publishing, p. 119.〕 In the 1970s, researchers Sorosky, Pannor and Baran drew upon the work of Sants to explore the concept in a number of publications, including a book titled , thus bringing "genealogical bewilderment" to a larger audience.〔Wellisch, 1952, as quoted by O'Shaughnessy, p. 119〕 ==Supporting Arguments== #Genealogy or genetic ancestry provides us with knowledge about ourselves, i.e., our heredity; #The knowledge about ourselves that a genealogy or genetic ancestry provides is knowledge of who we really are, i.e., our identity; #Normal psychological development requires knowledge of identity; #Normal psychological development requires knowledge of heredity.〔Leighton, K. (2012). “Addressing the harms of not knowing one's heredity: lessons from genealogical bewilderment”. “Adoption & Culture, (3) 63-102.〕 Each of these arguments is supported by E. Wellisch in his 1952 letter to the Journal of Mental Health: "Knowledge of and definite relationship to his genealogy is ... necessary for a child to build up his complete body image and world picture. It is an inalienable and entitled right of every person. There is an urge, a call, in everybody to follow and fulfill the tradition of his family, race, nation, and the religious community into which he was born. The loss of this tradition is a deprivation which may result in the stunting of emotional development."〔 These arguments are further supported by adoptee’s experience of abandonment, separation, and loss. They are no longer attached to their birth families, and so have lost a connection to their biological heritage. This loss is not considered as critical in infant adoptees, but is seen much more prominently in older adoptees. However, according to the "primal wound theory", separation from the mother results in a lack of mother-child bond and separation trauma.〔Verrier, N. (1993). The primal wound: Understanding the adopted child. Baltimore: Gateway Press.〕 抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア（Wikipedia）』 ■ウィキペディアで「genealogical bewilderment」の詳細全文を読む スポンサード リンク
|